Zizek writes, that the difference between Heidegger and Buddhism is that according to the former, Sein needs a Dasein that thinks about it, while according to the latter Sein needs nothing (goal being a complete absorption of Dasein in the Sein). Well, yes. This is like much of Zizek: really entertaining, but why would I even begin to compare Heidegger and Buddhism? I could, but the latter seems irrelevant in understanding the former. Or vice versa.
